Posts Tagged Japanese automakers
Big 3 woes imperil Japanese
Posted by PPI in Detroit News, News featuring PPI on November 12, 2008
This article was in the November 12th, 2008, Business section of The Detroit News. In the article, Dr. Henke speaks about how supplier working relations for the Japanese companies are markedly higher than that of the Big Three, and how the supply-chain is far more complicated than people may realize.
US Suppliers Shift R&D, Investment and Support to Japanese Automakers
Posted by PPI in Annual Automotive Supplier Survey, Articles by PPI, In the News on September 21, 2004
“US Suppliers Shift R&D, Investment and Support to Japanese Automakers.” Body Engineering. Fall 2004
Suppliers favor Japanese automakers
Posted by PPI in Annual Automotive Supplier Survey, Detroit Free Press, In the News, News featuring PPI on August 3, 2004
“Suppliers favor Japanese automakers.” Detroit Free Press. 3 August 2004
Ford, GM could borrow tips from Japanese on how to treat suppliers
Posted by PPI in Annual Automotive Supplier Survey, Detroit News, In the News, News featuring PPI on August 3, 2004
“Ford, GM could borrow tips from Japanese on how to treat suppliers.” The Detroit News. 3 August 2004
Study: Parts Maker Prefer Japanese
Posted by PPI in Annual Automotive Supplier Survey, In the News, Miscellaneous, News featuring PPI on August 2, 2004
“Study: Parts Makers Prefer Japanese.” TheCarConnection.com. 2 August 2004
Suppliers Relations with GM, Ford continue to slip
Posted by PPI in Annual Automotive Supplier Survey, Autobeat Daily, In the News, News featuring PPI on May 13, 2003
“Suppliers Relations with GM, Ford continue to slip.” Autobeat Daily. 13 May 2003; p.1
Japanese automakers continue to improve their relations with top-tier suppliers by pursuing a fundamentally different philosophy, reports an annual survey by Planning Perspectives Inc., a management consulting firm in Birmingham, Mich.
The survey rates Toyota Motor Corp. best and General Motors Corp. worst in supplier relations. This year’s scores improved for Toyota, Honda, Nissan and Chrysler Group. They worsened for Ford and GM.
Overall, the domestic OEMs “have done virtually nothing to change their working relations with suppliers over the past two years,” declares John Henke Jr., the firm’s president. “The Japanese Big Three continue to improve. Both groups are reaping what they sow.”
Planning Perspectives measures supplier attitude in 17 areas such as trust, willingness to share technology and rewards for cost-cutting ideas. It then distills results into a single rating for each OEM.
Here are the firm’s rating for 2003 and the percent improvement over last year (higher numbers are better):
Toyota 334 (+7.4%)
Chrysler 177 (+3.5%)
Honda 316 (+7.5%)
Ford 161 (-1.2%)
Nissan 259 (+15.1%)
GM 156 (-0.6%)
Planning Perspectives says Detroit’s Big Three automakers alienate suppliers, don’t involve them in their business and refuse their help. Japan’s Big Three OEMs do the opposite by applying to supplier relations on the same continuous improvement techniques they use on manufacturing processes, it says.

