Posts Tagged ford
Ford adds to list of preferred suppliers
Posted by PPI in Annual Automotive Supplier Survey, Automotive News, In the News, News featuring PPI on June 25, 2009
On June 24th , Automotive News’ Robert Sherefkin reported on Ford Motor Co. adding 16 companies to its list of preferred suppliers, five of them being European companies. He cites PPI’s annual automotive supplier survey in the article. To read the article on Automotive News you do need to have a subscription.
“Ford adds 16 to list of preferred suppliers.” Automotive News. 24 June 2009
Working with suppliers: Ford raises its game
Posted by PPI in Annual Automotive Supplier Survey, In the News, Miscellaneous, News featuring PPI on May 28, 2009
This article by Colin Whitbread for Automotive World discusses the results of the 2009 Annual Survey in wonderful detail. While most people are primarily talking about Honda’s and Toyota’s surprising rankings (which he naturally discusses as well), Whitbread focuses a little more on our domestic OEMs, especially Ford. Automotive World is based out of the UK.
“Working with suppliers: Ford raises its game.” Automotive World. 28 May 2009
Honda climbs to the top, Ford improves score
Posted by PPI in Annual Automotive Supplier Survey, In the News, Miscellaneous, News featuring PPI on May 25, 2009
An article about the results of the 2009 Annual Tier 1 – OEM Supplier Working Relations study:
“Honda climbs to the top, Ford improves score.” The Money Times. 25 May 2009
Annual Automotive OEM – Tier 1 Supplier Working Relations Study 2009
Posted by PPI in Annual Automotive Supplier Survey, Press Releases on May 25, 2009
Now in its 9th year, the annual study determines the supplier working conditions in numerous areas at the North American domestic OEMs (GM, Ford and Chrysler) and the foreign domestic OEMs (Toyota, Honda and Nissan). This year, 231 Tier 1 suppliers – representing 52% of the OEMs’ annual buy – responded to the survey. Demographically, the supplier-respondents represent 28 of the Top 50 North American suppliers, 43 of the Top 100 and 58 of the Top 150 North American suppliers. The study culminates in the Working Relations Index (WRI) which is a quantitative ranking by suppliers of their working relations with each of the six OEMs.
No bailout for Visteon, Ford execs say
Posted by PPI in Detroit News, News featuring PPI on January 30, 2009
This article, entitled “No bailout for Visteon, Ford execs say,” appeared in the January 30th, 2009, edition of The Detroit News. As the title states, the article is about Ford’s announcement that it would not provide financial backing to Visteon if the company were to fail. Visteon was originally Ford’s components operations department, until it became a standalone company supplying auto parts to Ford in 2000. The newspaper asked Dr. Henke his opinion on the situation:
Ford gave the proper public response but remains reliant on Visteon for parts and would have to help in some way if the automaker feared disruption of its flow of parts.
Toyota still tops supplier survey; Ford improves
Posted by PPI in Annual Automotive Supplier Survey, In the News, Miscellaneous, News featuring PPI on August 11, 2008
Here is an AP article about the 2008 Annual Automotive Supplier Survey reproduced in BusinessWeek.
“Toyota still tops supplier survey; Ford improves.” BusinessWeek. 11 August 2008
Ford In-Sourcing ACH Component Assembly
Posted by PPI in Annual Automotive Supplier Survey, In the News, News featuring PPI, Ward's Auto on March 14, 2008
“They probably don’t have a clue as to what the true costs are, so their answer is to bring it in-house. No one remembers what went on in the past, so they’re bound to continue making the same mistakes over and over again.”
- Dr. John W. Henke, Jr. on Ford’s decision to attempt to switch from outsourcing component assembly back to in-source.
“Ford In-Sourcing ACH Component Assembly.” Wards Auto.com. 14 March 2008
Ford’s Supply Chain Needs a Better Idea
Posted by PPI in Annual Automotive Supplier Survey, In the News, IndustryWeek, News featuring PPI on October 1, 2007
“Ford’s Supply Chain Needs a Better Idea.” IndustryWeek. 1 October 2007
Detroit Still Can’t Kick Its Habit of Ever-Rising Auto Incentives
Posted by PPI in Miscellaneous, News featuring PPI on August 16, 2004
“Detroit Still Can’t Kick Its Habit of Ever-Rising Auto Incentives.” Investor’s Business Daily. 16 August 2004
Mon Aug 16, 7:00 PM ET
Donna Howell
Cash rebates and cheap loan offers have never been so hefty. And auto analysts expect them to keep rising — despite Federal Reserve (news – web sites) rate hikes and signs that incentives may be losing their punch.
Detroit rolled out incentives in earnest to boost sales after 9-11. In July domestic automakers offered more than $4,000 per vehicle.
Rising interest rates could curtail low-APR car financing deals long-term, analysts say. But American carmakers need heavy incentives for the foreseeable future. Sales are faltering as SUV demand falls and foreign makes gain more ground.
“At the retail level we’ve actually seen about a 6%-7% sales decline year to date, in the case of GM and Ford,” despite high incentives, said Lehman Bros. analyst Darren Kimball.
The average discounts on General Motors, Ford and Chrysler vehicles hit $4,011 per unit in July, says auto site Edmunds.com. That’s up $192 from June. It includes cash-back deals, artificially low financing rates, leasing incentives and other enticements.
Detroit’s Discount Fever
Domestic carmakers spend more on incentives than foreign rivals. In July, European automakers’ U.S. incentives hit $2,562. Japanese makes reached $1,024, and Korean brands were slightly down at $1,833, Edmunds.com says.
Of U.S. makers, GM had the highest average incentive, $4,467 per vehicle. Ford had the steepest monthly hike, up $358 to $3,686 per vehicle. Chrysler discounted by $3,384, down $185 from June.
Kimball predicts U.S. carmakers will roll out even higher incentives and cut output. GM recently cut output of its poor-selling Saturn Ion.
And Detroit will be sanguine about small Fed moves, like the Aug. 10 quarter-point rate hike.
Automakers might want to tout their 0% loan offers even more, he says. Rate hikes make cheap financing even more attractive to consumers, says Paul Ballew, GM’s executive director of market and industry analysis.
Fed Hikes No Big Deal
Initially the appeal would be largely psychological. A quarter-percent rate rise boosts an average monthly payment only $2 a month, says Jesse Toprak, Edmunds.com’s director of pricing and market analysis.
“If it goes up a whole percent or more, automakers may rethink their low-APR strategies,” he said. “We may see financing for 48 months or shorter, or 0.9% rates (vs. 0% financing).”
GM raised incentives in early August, before the Fed’s hike. And Chrysler is expected to add incentives to new models later this year, such as the redesigned Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Incentives are rising at a slower pace due to the stronger economy, says Tom Libby, senior director of industry analysis for Power Information Network, part of consultancy J.D. Power & Associates.
“But the situation is still challenging for us,” said GM’s Ballew.
Another reason Detroit’s love affair with incentives may be peaking is that more isn’t necessarily better.
Of domestic makes, Ford upped its incentives the most in July, said Edmunds.com. Yet its market share fell over a percentage point to a record-low 16.8%.
“Increasing levels of discounts don’t necessarily result in hoped-for sales increases,” said George Pippas, Ford’s manager of sales analysis.
So in some cases Ford will curb incentives, even if it means ceding market share.
That’s the dilemma Big Three automakers must grapple with, Kimball says. “If they raise incentives further, will they see the kind of response they’d like to see from the consumer? Do they double down or emphasize actions on the supply side — cutting production?”
U.S. makers also face increasing pressure from foreign rivals on efficiency. Toyota (NYSE:TM – News) gained a little over $360 million from cost cuts in the June quarter and plans more.
Toyota already boasts an after-tax profit margin of 6.4%. Honda’s (NYSE:HMC – News) is 5.5%. But Ford’s is 3%. GM’s is 2.7% and DaimlerChrysler’s just 1.5%. Also, the top foreign makers enjoy better relationships with suppliers, surveys show. U.S. manufacturers are trying to compete better on several fronts, but still lag.
Big Three automakers’ fates depend on two factors, says Mike Wall, analyst at auto research firm CSM. “It’s product, and hopefully getting a really robust economic recovery,” he said.
U.S. carmakers look to new and redesigned models to drive sales free from profit-killing incentives. Chrysler was able to minimize incentives on its stylish new luxury car. The 300 sedan accounted for 27% of Chrysler brand July sales.
“Chrysler is going great guns with their new 300 series vehicles. Ford is doing great with its F150 (pickup) and they’re coming out with their 500 series car in the next couple of months. Everything I’ve heard says that’s a good auto,” said John Henke, president of Planning Perspectives, a Birmingham, Mich., manufacturing consultancy. “GM doesn’t have much in its pipeline, I’m told. That’s going to make it difficult for them to do well.”
Analyst Toprak says U.S. automakers might spend more money on designing cars and trucks that people are eager to buy rather than deeply discounting lackluster models.
“We might see more investing dollars,” he said. “So they can come out with more attractive products so vehicles can sell.”
Tastes can change. GM and Ford are especially dependent on large trucks and SUVs. While they have been a hit with consumers, high oil prices could crash the party.
“Their profit centers are these larger vehicles,” Kimball said.
SUVs sat on dealer lots longer in July even though their incentives rose at twice the industry average. Large SUVs sold for $9,463, or 22%, below their suggested sticker prices. Libby credits high gas prices, but also a renewed emphasis on cars.
“From everything we’ve seen in auto shows and feedback from manufacturers, cars will be more prominently displayed and advertised,” said Edmunds.com’s Toprak.
Toprak says U.S. makers are getting braver about going after niche markets with more stylish vehicles. That will mean making money with much more limited production runs.
Meantime, Japanese makers are making bigger inroads with trucks and SUVs. Toyota’s light truck sales rose over 9% from a year ago. It sold plenty of compact Tacoma pickups. But its best gains were on the Sienna van and the Tundra full-size truck.
Ford, GM could borrow tips from Japanese on how to treat suppliers
Posted by PPI in Annual Automotive Supplier Survey, Detroit News, In the News, News featuring PPI on August 3, 2004
“Ford, GM could borrow tips from Japanese on how to treat suppliers.” The Detroit News. 3 August 2004


